Without knowing how many people are in the industry, this is hard to quantify. As I’m not in the business myself, I don’t have any way to gauge.
If there are 5,000 job loses and there are only 50,000 people in the industry, that’s very significant and points to extremely serious industry issues.
If there’s 5,000 job loses and there’s 5,000,000 people in the industry, that’s more of a drop in the ocean, and while it would suck for the people involved, such job cuts wouldn’t point to any issues within the industry in and of themselves.
In that latter case, it could simply mean that some individual companies are downsizing and shifting gears to weather economic issues.
Obviously these job loses are a problem, I just wish articles like this would provide that much needed context.
This article compares the number of layoffs this year to last year, and makes a big deal about it. But that tells us NOTHING. That’s just comparing two arbitrary numbers in a vacuum.
What I mean is - If the layoffs last year were 5 people, and this year so far it was 20, their headline would be “2024 layoffs QUADRUPLE in January alone!!!”.
So, the comparison they’re making isn’t very informative in a vacuum. Is the number of layoffs they’re referencing from last year significant for the industry compared to previous years/decades, or close to average, or…?
What we need here is context and more depth of information in order to develop an understanding of the significance of this data and come to some conclusions.
And of course, it goes without saying that it sucks people are losing their jobs and having their lives thrown up in the air like this, regardless of the industry they work in. I wish them the best in landing on their feet.
I hate websites like this, I’m reading the article, and as I scroll through reading it, it starts to talk about something closely related but not quite the topic of the article, then it gets further and further from the point.
Then finally you realise it’s just feeding a bunch of DIFFERENT articles to you, making them look like they’re just subsections of the first article.
Especially as the first article seems to be incredibly short and ends abruptly without including the one bit of content they said they’d include, and there’s no reasonable separator or footer or spacer or anything to separate the article from the next one.
Eventually you realise they’ve wasted your time and duped you and you vow to never look at that website again, but christ, it’s annoying.
Vaseline is nothing like saliva. Take for example using it as lip balm, you certainly can’t use saliva for that!
It also works great to block hair dye around the edges of the hairline from staining the skin at all, and obviously saliva wouldn’t work.
Honestly I can’t think of any situation where you could substitute it for saliva, they’re in no way similar or compatible, completely different things.
If you think that 19 is a lot of news articles for the whole planet in a single day, enough that it counts as spam, then my friend have I got news for you :-(
You know what would be amazing? If we had a time machine in flight sim thay let us fly over reasonably accurate recreations of towns and cities throughout history, imagine flying over flanders fields, or London in the 1700s!
(My keyboard autocorrected ‘flight sim’ to ‘douche son’ I don’t know why my god)