@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Riccosuave

@Riccosuave@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Not only can it happen, it is likely to happen, and nobody is coming to save us.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Then why was Michael Cohen convicted? Was that a political persecution too, or are you just crying foul because somebody finally held your knuckle-dragging god king to account for once in his miserably pathetic fucking existence?

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I’m only interested in prison in the Federal cases, and that will only happen if and when he loses the election. After that I want Jack Smith to go full gloves off on the classified documents case, force the 11th circuits hand to recuse Loose Cannon, and then sit his fucking ass in court where they are pushing for life in prison without the possibility of parole. Then he can sit in his special cell all by himself with his secret service detail while he slowly rots from the inside out.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Locking him up over this conviction will only serve to embolden him, and win him sympathy amongst low information voters. Getting a conviction for colluding to retain state secrets, and potentially selling them to foreign actors is a whole different ball game chief. None of the prosecutions that matter are getting done before the election. That is just the fucking facts. I want him getting fisted in the ass with no lube by the Justice Department, and throwing him in jail now guarantees that never happens. Use your brain.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

If they sentence him to prison now, he will never see the inside of a cell before the election. It only helps his cause. You are so god damn naive if you don’t think that is the case. I’m looking for hard fucking time, no more pussyfooting, no more saber ratling. In order to do that he has to first lose the election, and then get bent over by the DOJ. That is the only way we have a chance of getting justice. If you don’t believe that then that’s on you, but you are 1000% fucking wrong.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

It does not help him among the Republicans who are passively accepting Trump, or anyone else.

See, you say that, but that is a historically illiterate perspective. The guy feeds on the medias negativity bias towards him. It literally makes him stronger because the entire Republican media apparatus is now designed to spin any criticism or bad news about him into another attack vector for them to further erode democracy. Their messaging is so overwhelming that this firehose of falsehoods strategy has become unquestionably effective. It no longer matters what the facts are, it’s only about the vibes.

So let me tell you how this is going to go: Trump is going to win because he is the ultimate martyr of white victimhood. The poor white working class will burn this country to the fucking ground before they allow anyone else to be doing perceptually better than them en masse. These people truly believe that the only thing better than helping someone up is standing on their fucking head and watching them drown. So, he is going to win because the American experiment has failed. You can take that to the bank because you know deep down I am exactly right.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Are you totally fine with the moral consequences of enforced veganism on the entire human population? I’m asking this because you must also understand that there are going to be seriously detrimental and inescapable outcomes associated with that as well. Life only comes from death. You can fundamentally dislike the arrangement, but as far as we are aware that is a necessary input-output relationship. Choosing which deaths you are okay with is simply trading one Faustian bargain for another.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

First, I just want to say that this isn’t personal to me. I am concerned with the overarching ramifications of dismantling the current industrial meat, animal, and agricultural industries without first having sufficiently scalable solutions to replace them. This will kill a lot of people, and they will die in horrible ways. If you want to stop the suffering of animals you better know how to do so in a way that won’t cause additional suffering to humanity, otherwise you are never going to reach the critical mass necessary to make the change. I’m also more than willing to admit that the greed and corruption in the governmental and economic systems of the world would need to be changed as well. Good luck with that, I fully support it.

Saying “life only comes from death” is a cowardly reductionism.

No, it is an objectively verifiable fact that is backed up by even the most basic level of scientific literacy. You are confusing the higher order ethical dilemmas of sentient consciousness with the fundamental realities of nature. You can dislike it, and I understand that. I don’t like it either, but I am also not naive enough to simply ignore reality because it makes me feel bad. You are using the same kind of blind dogmatism in your response that you are accusing me of using even though I did no such thing.

sustaining human life does not require the wanton suffering of animals.

That is entirely dependant upon your interpretation of “wanton”. There is currently no other way for us to sustain life on this planet with the same degree of convenience that is afforded to us by the industrialization of the food system. Can it be made better? Sure, and I am 1000% in favor of that. But suggesting that we are going to be able to eliminate the need for animals in the supply chain anytime soon is a complete fantasy. Even if we could, there will be other health considerations that come from that which need to be researched, and well understood before we bank our survival on them. That will take many decades at best.

Don’t be a coward like I used to be by pretending that animals and plants are the same.

I literally never said that. You’re projecting here, which is whatever honestly. I get people make this argument. I’m just not one of them.

The fact of the matter is that humans have not been a collaborative member of any ecosystem for tens of thousands of years.

I’m not sure it has been quite that long, but I agree with your general premise. Overall humanity is a destructive force if you consider the preservation of nature in its pre-industrial form to be optimal. I can appreciate that argument. I’m not entirely convinced that human life is more valuable than any other life. I’m also not entirely convinced that the proliferation of life more generally has any objectively quantifiable value. That is a philosophical argument that is beyond the scope of this conversation. Again, I’m only interested in logistically feasible goals that can be realistically implemented.

Humans are omnivores and the simple reality is that as an omnivore with options at your disposal you have a choice about whether the process of sustaining your life involves wanton suffering at a massive scale or not.

Not really. What I do personally is entirely inconsequential. Systems matter. People don’t. I don’t enjoy killing things. I don’t “derive pleasure” from the suffering of others in the way you are accusing me of. However, I am willing to accept the ethical realities of eating animal protein, and I understand that I would not be alive today if my ancestors had not done the same for billions of years. So no, I don’t enjoy it, but unlike you I do accept it. I am perfectly willing to facilitate moving the system in a more humane direction in whatever small ways I can make an impact, but I’m also not stressing about livestock having to die in order to feed people either. On some level it just is what it is.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

/agree

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I was using that as an extreme hypothetical. You can call that disingenuous if you like. I just don’t see how you can remove “animal suffering” from the equation without enforcing that measure. Otherwise all you are doing is drawing a subjective line around what suffering is acceptable and what isn’t. I’m personally fine with trying to make that determination in the least arbitrary way possible with the best technology possible so we can progress society forward, but let’s not act like there still won’t be people who see that cost as unacceptable.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Imagine if there was a life form stronger or smarter than humans, what would you want to say to it? “Life only comes from death so eat me or abuse me”. We can and should do better.

As far as we know the propagation of life requires the consumption of other life as inputs, or in other words every single living thing on this planet must consume material from other organic life to subsist.

Therefore, in your hypothetical I would expect that any life form that required the domestication and industrial consumption of sentient life-forms or their byproducts as a matter of survival to absolutely do so regardless of the ethical implications. If it was a matter of survival, we would become an input. Absolutely zero question about it.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

People can complain about the system and try to make it better without having all of the answers.

I totally agree, and I’m fine with that.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Regarding your first paragraph: I was operating based on a very loose hypothetical question that you posed. So, I think you’re unintentionally strawmanning me here a little bit…

As far as the second paragraph is concerned I see your point. However, I specifically said life had to consume other organic material to survive, but not necessarily kill in the process. At some level of the food chain it does ultimately become a necessity though, and I do not see that as an ethical dilemma per se.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Again, it was an extreme hypothetical. There were multiple people in this thread who outright suggested that as an option, which is why I asked the question.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I’m not a typical conservative though. FTFY

You should make peace with that, and accept that the real values that represent the end game of conservative politics have finally shown themselves. There is no going back.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Correct, which is further dragging the Overton window to the right. Everything conservatism touches is tainted, and ultimately destroyed. It is a self-defeating philosophy.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Because that will be a massive escalation that will certainly draw significant retaliation from Russia that could spill over into a full fledged conflict with NATO.

'Confused' Judge Cannon needed concept explained 'slowly' to her in court by lawyers: NYT (www.rawstory.com)

As part of an analysis of how U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge Aileen Cannon, reports from her courtroom show a judge who is both “prickly” and" insecure" and often has trouble understanding what lawyers from both sides try to explain to her....

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Can’t
Understand
Lawyer
Thinking

^ Aileen Cannon

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I usually go with:

Can’t
Understand
Normal
Thinking

😂

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Gives a whole new meaning to ring burn 🔥 😅

Netanyahu says deadly Israeli strike in Rafah was the result of a 'tragic mistake' (apnews.com)

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that a “tragic mistake” was made in an Israeli strike in the southern Gaza city of Rafah that set fire to a camp housing displaced Palestinians and, according to local officials, killed at least 45 people....

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

It was a mistake. The mistake was the US not cutting all ties with Israel immediately.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

So long Steam. We had a good run, but I guess it is finally time for Phil Spencer to take you out behind the woodshed.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Good on them. Maybe the Krauts can rescue us from the neckbeard fascists in this country if Trump wins in November.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

In that case we’re probably fucked like a tired sheep.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

He knew this shit wouldn’t be popular with his base

Did he though? I think it is much more likely that he is either:

  • (Most Likely Scenario): Living in the past, is completely out of touch with the modern liberal voter base, and is under the illusion that some segment of the older moderates in the base still actively give a fuck about supporting Israel.
  • (Less Likely Scenario): Trying to strategically thread the needle because he knows that attacking Israel will cause them to further undermine American democracy, and lead to them playing double agent while they assist Russia in installing Donald Trump as president.

In either scenario I believe he thought he was preserving his election chances. What these fucking morons in the entrenched neo-liberal political class fail to realize is that the overwhelming majority of the electorate does not want the US involved in funding any more offensive conflicts, and that there are actually repercussions for the moral disgust people feel over their tax dollars being used to murder innocent people. At some point the “vote for me or get fucked in the ass” proposition fails to be effective anymore, and people just bend over.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Republicans don’t give a single fuck about the Constitution, civil rights, or giving medical care to anyone that isn’t part of the oligarchy.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Conceptually I agree with you. In practice I’m going to continue being despondent, angry, and depressed.

Chuck Todd: The campaign shakeup Biden needed (www.nbcnews.com)

And here’s one more technicality about scheduling an early debate: If the debate is a complete debacle for one of them, each party technically has time and a process to change nominees. After all, this first debate will take place before either candidate is the official nominee of their party....

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

There is a 0% chance this happens unless Biden drops dead.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

This isn’t entirely true. Many states who have legalized Cannabis have expunged convictions off of people’s records automatically, or have created a process where an individual can request it.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I see. That isn’t how I interpreted their comment, but I do agree with that assessment. Even if Cannabis was federally legalized I’m not sure that the federal government could force states to retroactively overturn convictions, but I am just making an assumption as that is beyond the scope of my legal knowledge.

Despite polls, Biden aides insist Gaza campus protests will not hurt reelection bid (www.reuters.com)

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - Several top White House aides say they are confident protests across U.S. college campuses against Israel’s offensive in Gaza will not translate into significantly fewer votes for Joe Biden in November’s election, despite polls showing many Democrats are deeply unhappy about the president’s...

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Sorry, no sock puppets here. Just a regular old pain in the ass.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

That’s not fair at all. Trash bags have a lot of utility.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

No surprise there. They own half the politicians in this country. Bought and paid for with your tax dollars. What a fucking disgrace.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

She popped her berserker rage cooldown, and decided it was time to unleash her lifelong desire to harm small animals for fun.

I would not be surprises if the next plot twist in her psycopath story arc was her secretly being a serial killer.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, she’s got that fucking Johnny Bravo phenotype.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I’m sorry champ. I like Johnny Bravo too, and I kinda regret my comparison now 😅

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

It was a terrorist state from the beginning.

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

I mean, Lemmy lets you stay even though you are annoying as fuck, and nobody brutalizes you for sharing your viewpoints (psychotic as they may be). Perhaps you could put that shoe on the other foot if you could first pull it out of your mouth.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

You’re welcome to leave anytime. In fact, I would encourage it!

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, it’s definitely the fault of the people who are pushing for reform, and civilian oversight.

Staffing shortages couldn’t possibly be because there are tons of cops who didn’t want a bright light shined on their horrible, abusive behavior that they have been allowed to get away with, completely unchecked, since time immemorial…

What we need is to de-fang the police unions, force them into the same collective bargaining pools as the rest of the employees in their municipalities, like all the other EMS workers, and then make them accountable to the civilians they are policing so we find police who actually give a fuck about bettering their communities.

What Columbia Should Have Done Instead of Brutalizing Its Student Protesters (slate.com)

One example, from just up the Ivy-garlanded I-95, at Brown University, was announced just hours before Shafik again called in the police. Brown’s governing body agreed to vote on a proposal that would divest the school’s endowment of companies affiliated with Israel in a meeting in October. The proposal is based on a 2020...

Riccosuave, (edited )
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar

- Housing Crisis: Largely caused by Republican fiscal policies

- Student Loan Crisis: Largely caused by Republican fiscal policies

- Lack of Single Payer Healthcare: Directly caused by Republican social, fiscal, and legislative policy

- Revocation of Abortion Rights: Directly caused by Republican social policies and weaponization of the Judicial system

- Destabalization of the Middle East: Directly caused by Republican (Neo-Conservative) foreign policy

Every fucking issue you just posted about was caused by the party YOU CLAIM TO SUPPORT. I really don’t understand how it is possible for someone to be this fucking ignorant. I really feel bad for you homie.

You are working so far against your own interest you don’t even know it. Conservatism is about preserving power, control, and resources for those who already have them, and that ain’t you. Grow the fuck up, and understand what world you are living in.

Riccosuave,
@Riccosuave@lemmy.world avatar
  • Russia forcefully invaded a sovereign country without provocation.
  • Israel is conducting an asymmetrical war against an oppressed minority, and using collective punishment.

I wouldn’t expect someone with your limited ethical, and intellectual capacity to understand why those things are wrong. I would, in-fact, expect that you are in favor of both of those things since you want to allow the United States to be turned into a fascist hell-hole just for the fucking lulz.

Can’t win on Lemmy (or Reddit!).

Hopefully you never win because in the marketplace of ideas you are fucking bankrupt.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines