Shardikprime

@Shardikprime@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Shardikprime,

And then you guys ask yourselves why would anyone not vote in your favor.

Nice

Shardikprime,

I think people have been waiting for solutions and they are reacting to those not being offered now, not in a potential future

Shardikprime,

I always welcome criminals getting their just desserts

Shardikprime,

The “controversy” they talk about is when He is talking about market failures and brings up the “externalities” that are the side effects (which can be negative or positive, but when talking about a market failure you are talking only about the negative) that occur when producing or consuming.

A well-known example for externalities is pollution: I am a company, I produce, but I “externalize” the expenses associated with my production by throwing waste into the environment (something we pay as a society when in reality the responsibility is private).

But that is an externality in production.

He speaks of an externality in consumption that would be when the side effect arises from the fact of consuming.

Now those are similar, but for consumption.

For example, the case of the pandemic in the USA when the people were going to the supermarkets to stock up on toilet paper, leaving them empty. The negative externality of consumption there is that there are people who couldn’t wash their butts

I hope that makes sense

In this case, bringing it to the example of toilet paper, the guy is saying something like that, eventually, people are going to stink so much that they are going to look for an alternative to toilet paper. Therefore, proving that the market did not fail because it was actually part of the market discovery process.

Now, it is one thing to think that he is wrong and another different thing to not understand what he’s referring to.

And whatever the case, it is true that cutting the context is quite hypocritical and biased because it is talking about a hypothetical situation where he counterargues using absurdity.

That is, regardless of what you may think about what he said or whatever his argument exactly is, it is certain that he is not referring to what we all understood when we read the subtitle of the news.

Shardikprime,

My cloves have doubled since the last time we met

Shardikprime,

Obviously Israel must roll over and let itself be genocided as stated in Hamas charter

Shardikprime,

Great, fuck Hamas terrorists and the leftist terrorist supporters

Shardikprime,

Thanks to Ez Squeeze ketchup from Heinz, 90s kids won’t even have to imagine. They have seen it

Shardikprime,

Bro forgot the trees. Absolutely unwatchable

Shardikprime,

Depends. Does she align with your current ideology flavor?

Shardikprime,

Yeah I don’t align with drug cartel sponsors

Shardikprime,

It would go against the norm here.

Read the comments and notice the lack of any critical input against the criminal

Shardikprime,

I mean there are bayou recipes with crabs and chocolate so this isn’t as weird as one could think

Shardikprime,

I’m any case neither has it. Only one person attained the moral high ground and only through intense training

Shardikprime,

I love the game boy games on the switch so here I am

Shardikprime,

Yeah this surely has nothing to do with it.

Shardikprime,

Son, I am disappoint. Go touch some grass

Shardikprime,

Bro imagine having the balls to be so ignorant yet so brave

Shardikprime,

My boi doesn’t sweat, breaths, spends ATP or has active metabolic processes while sleeping DAMM

Shardikprime,

🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀

Shardikprime,

There is indeed inherent dichotomy in the post

Shardikprime,

But milei hasn’t eradicated the ministry of education. Why do you spread misinformation?

Shardikprime,

Being absorbed by another ministry does not by any means implies that it has been ERADICATED. At most it became a secretary or sub secretary, but not gone.

You are spreading misinformation

Shardikprime,

And? Barring any opinion on it, it’s not illegal, and people have the rights to exercise their beliefs in ways that don’t impact third parties negatively, as weird at it might sound.

Focusing on that again, instead of the achievement of pulling a win with almost no resources against a fully, decades deeply state entrenched political party through a, by any normal politics, very unpopular message of reigning spend, while being lambasted in the dirtiest campaign ever seen in Argentina, is miopic and a bit misogynistic too imo, given that she is being minimized from the beginning just by her occupation as if she cannot provide value?

Shardikprime,

Man I had forgotten about when people memed with trump saying orange man bad and now you made me remember hahaha

Shardikprime,

Sure? I don’t know what has got to do with anything?

Shardikprime,

You don’t, others do. Might sound incredible but reading people’s minds is actually impossible

Shardikprime,

You still assume that. Try to prove it in a court of law and see how that goes. Meanwhile, touch some grass

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines