I mean i don’t hate them and i do acknowledge their benefits but they’re primary goal is for enterprise. Slowly many more such software will be pushed onto the average user and it might become something you cannot replace just like what happened with systemd.
Is wayland the horse here. That would make sense. Xorg would be the car since it is objectively better and actually works. The only “benefits” of wayland would be similar to saying horses are better since they don’t contribute to global warming.
I recognize my inability to contribute. What I do understand is if red hat truly cared a tiny bit about desktop linux they would have intervened in the 18 year history of wayland. They’re either afraid of acknowledging the fact that 18 years went down the drain or they are doing it on purpose. Mostly the latter.
Progress is good but the other reasons are fundamental faults of wayland. You cannot “fix” them, the only solution is to make X12. And no wayland is not X12.