I’m concerned about the privacy implications of DNA testing services like 23andMe or AncestryDNA. What are the potential risks of sharing our genetic data with those companies, and are there any privacy-focused alternatives available?
I somehow missed this to be a flatpak via Discover. Granted this may not be usual in distros with a traditional update model, downgrading packages may be present in rolling distros, or distros with overlapping minor versions, or having 3rd party repos providing conflicting packages to those of the distro.
I offer my system as example:
<span style="color:#323232;">The following product is going to be upgraded:
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240211-0 -> 20240313-0
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">The following 14 packages are going to be downgraded:
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> ghc-binary ghc-containers ghc-deepseq ghc-directory ghc-exceptions ghc-mtl ghc-parsec ghc-pretty ghc-process ghc-stm ghc-template-haskell ghc-text ghc-time ghc-transformers
</span>
What are the risks of sharing DNA?
I’m concerned about the privacy implications of DNA testing services like 23andMe or AncestryDNA. What are the potential risks of sharing our genetic data with those companies, and are there any privacy-focused alternatives available?
Element app updating backwards on Debian 12 KDE? (lemmy.giftedmc.com)
This might be a real stupid question but why is discover updating to a lower version? Is there any place I can read up why this is the case?...