Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

rbn, to lemmyshitpost in Automation

And takes well-informed (buying) decisions with a high focus on quality.

rbn, to lemmyshitpost in I Might Have Ordered the Wrong Sandwich

They just describe all the meat based on the animal’s size in relation to a horse.

Chicken? < Horse Horse? = Horse Beef? > Horse

rbn, to 196 in 4 year ruled Lemmy meme to put things into perspective

Hey bro, you mind if I watch you being alone?

rbn, to lemmyshitpost in Thamks Biben

You have to continuously feed momma dollie little gold nuggets during the pregnancy to cover additional need for nutrients.

rbn, to opensource in Contributing to FOSS as a Sysadmin

As a ‘last resort’ if you don’t find any technical tasks in the projects you’d like to contribute to, there’s also plenty of other ways to help:

  • Provide new translations into foreign languages
  • Create detailed bug reports
  • Do in-depth tests of new beta versions or nightly builds
  • Provide a download mirror for the software or seed it via torrent
  • Donate money to the core maintainers
  • Improve the documentation
  • Create (video) tutorials to improve the start for other users and make the software known to a broader audience
  • Register in forums and help other users with their issues

Or simply ask the maintainers how you might contribute in a meaningful way. I’m sure they’ll appreciate your offer!

rbn, to foss in Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men

The study differentiates between male and female only and purely based on physical features such as eye brows, mustache etc.

I agree you can’t see one’s gender but I would say for the study this can be ignored. If you want to measure a bias (‘women code better/worse than men’), it only matters what people believe to see. So if a person looks rather male than female for a majority of GitHub users, it can be counted as male in the statistics. Even if they have the opposite sex, are non-binary or indentify as something else, it shouldn’t impact one’s bias.

rbn, (edited ) to foss in Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men

Thanks for pointing that out.

Seems like a wild idea as… a) it poisons the data not only for AI but also real users like me (I swear I’m not a bot :D). b) if this approach is used more widely, AIs will learn very fast to identify and ignore such non-sense links and probably much faster than real humans.

It sounds like a similar concept as captchas which annoy real people, yet fail to block out bots.

rbn, to foss in Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men

Thank you. Unfortunately, your link doesn’t work either - it just leads to the creative commons information). Maybe it’s an issue with Firefox Mobile and Adblockers. I’ll check it out later on a PC.

rbn, (edited ) to foss in Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men

Anyone found the specific numbers of acceptance rate with in comparison to no knowledge of the gender?

On researchgate I only found the abstract and a chart that doesn’t indicate exactly which numbers are shown.

edit: https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/594ddd8a-711c-453f-abae-92638e1bf918.webp

Interesting for me is that not only women but also men had significantly lower accepance rates once their gender was disclosed. So either we as humans have a really strange bias here or non binary coders are the only ones trusted.

edit²: https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/05554d35-a623-471c-a7fb-57301d48164e.webp

I’m not sure if I like the method of disclosing people’s gender here. Gendered profiles had their full name as their user name and/or a photography as their profile picture that indicates a gender.

So it’s not only a gendered VS. non-gendered but also a anonymous VS. indentified individual comparison.

And apparantly we trust people more if we know more about their skills (insiders rank way higher than outsiders) and less about the person behind (pseudonym VS. name/photography).

rbn, to 196 in Candyman, Candyman, candy nope

The Guardian counted 50000 only. Any higher bids?

theguardian.com/…/north-carolina-bees-house-wall

rbn, to foss in NewPipe v0.27.0 released

Agreed! Comments on comments were the last reason I sometimes went back to the original YouTube app!

rbn, to foss in NewPipe v0.27.0 released

Does anyone know if there is a way to do one-time donations to Newpipe without signing up for Libera Pay? E.g. did the team publish their IBAN or PayPal account?

rbn, to world in Paedophiles could be stripped of parental rights under new law

Drunk driving and murder are potentially dangerous for the child as well. I agree that it’s a very difficult topic to tie parental rights to one’s criminal records.

rbn, to lemmyshitpost in Only in Settings can you find Life's true meaning

And for the retro fans, there’s not only control center but also control center legacy!

rbn, to 196 in Spaghetti-rule-cation

*a rough rule of pinkie

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines