This legitimizes the rest of the restrictions by providing them a “well see we allowed actually needed abortions so all the other bans are fine” out for future challenges. Kangaroo’s gonna kanga.
Who the fuck cares? One state that misrepresented their intentions doesn’t help the other 49 under their initial fuckstorm of trying to unravel Roe v Wade.
If it’s not universal for all, it’s not acceptable. We shouldn’t have people stealing away to other states to have basic healthcare like they are bootleggers in the 20’s, or aren’t capable of making their own fucking healthcare decisions.
“Emergency abortions” still give the forced-birthers too much leeway to decide when the mother’s life is at risk. A woman should not literally be septic and her organs shutting down before she gets the care she needs.
Not without un-federalising. Given that generally, red states are net receivers of cash and blue states are net payors, that seems unlikely - TX rhetoric be damned.
Not that I’d begrudge Texas taking Abbot and Costello Paxton and kindly fucking right off, nor would I vote to spill one drop of American blood to keep them by force, of course
Add comment