@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

lady_scarecrow

@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Trans woman and amateur writer.
Tumblr: ladyscarecrow
My free novel: archive.org/details/book_20240528

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I don’t think there were any bad intentions on OP’s end, but the highlighted claim that a person is female and therefore has this or that genitalia is indeed transphobic.

Someone’s probably going to show up and say “but it says ‘female’, not ‘woman’!” Well, “female” as an adjective referring to people already means woman. A female doctor is a doctor who is a woman. And “female” as a noun (e.g., “the females”) is a terrible way to refer to people, to begin with.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I’ll just copy-paste what I said last time:

The idea that gender is entirely socially constructed is easily the greatest misconception about gender that gets repeated time and again – almost always by cis people, who never think too much about it because they’ve never had to reconsider their own gender.

Gender roles and gender stereotypes really are socially constructed, like the idea that some clothes are feminine and others are masculine, just to name one example. Gender identity, however, is not. If that was true, like the previous commenter was saying, conversion therapy for trans people would work, when it’s been shown it absolutely doesn’t. Gender dysphoria isn’t a social construct either. Many trans people see their own lives improve considerably after taking HRT (hormone therapy) and having gender-affirming surgeries – how can that be explained socially? Also, we know there is a genetic component to being trans as well, because of twin studies. All of which shows there really is a biological component to gender – just not in the “gender = genitals” way that transphobes think.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The rationale that many people follow is that if gender is socially constructed, it can be socially changed as well (through conversion therapy) to make your kid align with their assigned gender at birth, which doesn’t work in reality.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I can see why this idea would seem appealing to agender people. But that’s taking one’s personal case and turning it into a statement about gender as a whole. Gender having a biological component isn’t at odds with agender or NB people, but claiming gender is socially constructed is indeed problematic, like I said before.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

saying gender is not a construct is a strong/radical statement in the context of theory

To be clear, I’m saying gender identity isn’t a social construct (gender roles definitely are). And that’s hardly a radical statement given that there is a genetic factor to being trans, as evidenced by e.g. twin studies like this one which found a much higher amount of cases where both twins are trans among identical twins (who have the same genetic code) than non-identical twins. Also, like I mentioned before, a lot of trans people feel considerable relief to their own gender dysphoria upon seeking hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries, which is quite hard to explain on a social basis.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

For the last time, girls don’t do this stuff for attention. People keep saying that because they don’t take sapphic relationships seriously.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

That phrase comes from people who are either stuck in the closet, or in denial about their own sexuality. It is just one of the many byproducts of a society that still insists on considering that being straight is the only “normal” way of being.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It’s depressing that the original one was changed in the first place – our existence can’t even be acknowledged in a video game without people collectively freaking out… Well, at least they fixed it now.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I wish I could be the chaos activist but my bed is soooo comfy

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

People who own guns are at a much higher risk of suicide. Guns might make you feel safe, but in reality the most likely person to die from your gun is yourself.

lady_scarecrow,
@lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Except neither study is talking about the most the most common form of suicide. They’re both reporting higher rates of suicide among gun owners.

Me owning a gun doesn’t increase my likelihood to die

That’s literally what both studies are saying. From the first one:

Men who owned handguns were eight times more likely than men who didn’t to die of self-inflicted gunshot wounds. Women who owned handguns were more than 35 times more likely than women who didn’t to kill themselves with a gun.

From the second one:

in Wyoming, where 63 percent of households reported owning guns—rates of suicide were higher. The inverse was also true: where gun ownership was less common, suicide rates were also lower.

Also from the second source,

Studies show that most attempters act on impulse, in moments of panic or despair. Once the acute feelings ease, 90 percent do not go on to die by suicide.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines