slurpyslop

@slurpyslop@kbin.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

slurpyslop,

the democrat party will lose if a segment of their voter base abstains from voting

and

the democrat platform can afford to completely ignore a segment of their voter base so doesn't need to adjust their platform

are two mutually exclusive positions

slurpyslop,

can't withhold a vote because policy won't change because if it did people would withhold their vote and then the policy would change

slurpyslop,

it's not a mistake because it's not a real rule

This isn't an example of how modern English is going to the dogs. Less has been used this way for well over a thousand years—nearly as long as there's been a written English language. But for more than 200 years almost every usage writer and English teacher has declared such use to be wrong. The received rule seems to have originated with the critic Robert Baker, who expressed it not as a law but as a matter of personal preference. Somewhere along the way—it's not clear how—his preference was generalized and elevated to an absolute, inviolable rule.

one less thing for you to worry about

slurpyslop,

"liberal" is significantly less specific in its implications, both in terms of modern day parlance and historical roots, than "zionist"

slurpyslop,

doubling down on the stance of not understanding linguistics isn't the play you seem to think it is

the wikipedia article on zionism is several thousand words long, and you seem to think it's possible to accurately boil that down to a one or two sentence dictionary entry

I’m sure Republicans have many definitions for a liberal.

it's more that they don't have a definition at all

they use it similarly to "woke", in that its a nebulous word that takes on any given meaning that they want given the context

if you tried to distill its myriad of uses into an actual definition you'd get something like "person i disagree with to the point of dislike", at which point the dumb part becomes making an assertion as utterly vacuous as "i don't like people i don't like"

it's completely dissimilar

slurpyslop,

you're not avoiding excessive detail in a definition due to a limited character space, you're saying that a word can literally only ever have the precise meaning ascribed to it by the dictionary

those are two completely different things and it's astonishing that you would even try to make an argument that bad after opening this discussion with "i'm sure you can do better than that"

slurpyslop,

i'm not trying to justify my use of language, i'm explaining why you're wrong, and you're responding by gesturing vaguely towards the concept of a dictionary

slurpyslop,

the first result is the wikipedia article, which as we've discussed, is several thousand words long

slurpyslop,

lmfao

slurpyslop,

i like the concept of hiring other gooners to have a big sweaty circlejerk with

slurpyslop,

you ask a comedically loaded question, receive one in response, then get mad?

what?

The State Department said that Israel's military campaign in Gaza may have violated international law. (www.nytimes.com)

The Biden administration has concluded it is “reasonable to assess” that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has violated international law, but has not found specific instances that would justify the withholding of military aid, the State Department told Congress on Friday....

slurpyslop,

if there were some figures i could fiddle to fit that narrative, do you think that would mean that cutting down 250 acres of forest would actually be worth it rather than a convenience somebody has gussied up as "necessary" because it would make them a profit?

slurpyslop,

shows what you guys know

i met a girl through her bio last week and it turns out we're so compatible we have the same social security number, birthday and mother's maiden name

slurpyslop,

Redfalls team is done for sure.

which is wild, because there's clearly a lot of talent there that was just spunked up the wall trying to create a game that any idiot could see right from the outset was conceptually awful

slurpyslop,

I survived because the fire inside me burned brighter than the fire around me

slurpyslop,

wouldn't it be a more effective protest to drive there, park, spend 3 hours browsing the aisles, before finally buying a single pint of milk

slurpyslop, (edited )

sounds like there's already a crowd?

also, how many times have you decided to visit a food store because it was busy?

slurpyslop,

a restaurant, maybe

a grocery store, what?

slurpyslop,

i do find it slightly horrifying that in romania they can just decide to put you in prison indefinitely without having to prove you did anything

slurpyslop,

i'm not defending tate he deserves to rot in prison

i'm saying that a government shouldn't have the power to just dump you in prison without having a reason for it

when tate was initially arrested he was held for months without being charged

being absolutely fine with a system that allows that because in this instance it happened to fall onto a guy you don't like is brain rot

you think the osu protestors that were just released without being charged would've been released at all without a law requiring them to be charged within 24 hours?

banning and deleting your multiple accounts troll accounts defending Tate

i have literally no idea what you're talking about and it makes you sound unhinged

slurpyslop,

when tate was initially arrested he was held for months without being charged

slurpyslop,

when tate was initially arrested he was held for months without being charged

slurpyslop,

if you're arrested in the us, you have to be charged or released within a specific timeframe

they can't just detain you indefinitely for fun

slurpyslop,
slurpyslop,

in the us, if you're arrested you need to be charged or released within a fixed period, usually up to 72 hours

tate was arrested in december, held for 3 months without being charged, was moved to house arrest, then was charged in june

slurpyslop,
slurpyslop,

i do find it slightly horrifying that in romania they can just decide to put you in prison indefinitely without having to prove you did anything

can you just not read

slurpyslop,

what are you asking me to prove? that tate was held without being charged?

slurpyslop,

buddy if your replies get any dumber i'm going to have to assume you're an andrew tate fan

slurpyslop,

lmao

slurpyslop,

yeah but ultimately it doesn't matter because the end product is good on the whole

i feel those kinds of details are exactly what meddlers would want to meddle in, when the entire argument of the article is that the game manages to be good on the whole not despite its lack of meddlers but because of it

slurpyslop,

if you respond to "touch grass" with anything along the lines of an imperious "hah what fallacious and illogical reasoning" while pushing up your glasses on the bridge of your nose like an anime villain, then yes i think it might be meadow time for you

slurpyslop,

you can be incredibly passionate while still having mbas breathing down your neck

if you don't think there was a ratio of developers to neck-breathers of at best 2:1 at blizzard you have more faith in their internal management than me

slurpyslop,

larian isn't making bg4, and hasbro are

absolutely

going to fuck it up trying to milk it

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines