Gateron low profile switches… which seem (slightly) better than chocs for low profile switches. Also, I think that the Gateron low profile switches work fine in MX hotswap sockets.
There are some low profile tripod stands. the manfrotto MP3-BK is nice, but pretty expensive. There are also a bunch of “Z Tripods” that get used a lot.
A 3d printed case for tenting is definitely an option, but it can take a while to find the right tenting angle so be prepared to possible print multiple variations.
I have a moonlander and generally really like it, however I would take a second look at the glove 80. I’m tempted to eventually sell my moonlander or start saving up for a glove 80.
The moonlander is pretty solid, and you can get used to the thumb cluster, but I have smaller hands too, and it’s tough to reach across all of the moonlander while touch typing. I think a key well would help with that issue.
Taking a better look at the glove80, it’s definitely appealing to me, since it also has the function keys on it. It’s about CA$550 vs about CA$450 for the dactyl, which has less keys.
I’m trying to find one that I can use for years to come, since they are very pricey.
Please don’t tell me about other keyboards! I got a Moonlander, am really happy with it and consider it my endgame board. Not like all the other endgame boards, I swear!
I have a Moonlander and find it works well for me. Took a little while to get used to, but really not long, and the longer I used it, the more I liked it. Not sure what you mean that it doesn’t have many keys, as it has way more than a lot of ergo keyboards?
It has more than the ergo I saw too. I’m used to number row and function keys and wouldn’t want to lose that. That would probably take some getting used to it but if I can still have those keys, no reason to choose one that doesn’t.
I know of almost no ergo boards that have dedicated function keys. Moonlander does have number keys though… and you can use layers to turn those into function keys…
Yeah, I get it. I say the same thing about boards with no number keys and people tell me I can just use layers. But for whatever reason, layers for function keys makes more sense to me. It’s just like pressing “shift” except instead of “shift” you press a different button and the number/function key.
Super cool! I’ve been looking at a 3x5+2 dactyl, and thought about trying to squeeze a trackball in there too. This design is so close to what I envision as my ideal keyboard.
Controller will be a PI pico from We Act, the old version is using a blackpill. Under the hood, it’s running QMK. I also have an MX version in the works, actually it’s currently my daily driver, hmut there’s some small tweaks that need to be made…trackball positioning is super hard to get right.
Curious, what is it missing from your ideal keyboard? I’m open to making changes…
Fewer keys is the main one, I whittled my layout on a preonic down to 34 keys and have a ferris sweep now which I am very happy with.
I want to try some more options in terms of form factor, but keep the same key count, a 34 key dactyl was next on my list, with the idea of integrating a trackball potentially.
There are a few builds out there with the dactyl + trackball combo, but every person that makes and shares their process makes it easier for the next person, so kudos to you.
ergomechkeyboards
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.