Schmoo,

What you described is just welfare, not socialism. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production, meaning there would be no need to re-distribute wealth as it would be fairly distributed from the start.

What you’re thinking of is more along the lines of what Scandinavian countries have, which is just capitalism with social democracy and extensive welfare programs.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • startrek@startrek.website
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines