rockSlayer, 5 days ago

Well this is a firehose of bullshit.

1. What part of the article is factually wrong?
2. What specifically gives you the feeling that the article is unreliable?
3. Why does it matter whether or not the lawyers representing the state department work at the state department?
4. Why should tattoos of any kind be an indication of whether a non-citizen spouse can get a visa?
5. How exactly does the headline mischaracterize the ruling or the majority opinion?