Landsharkgun,

That looks horrible. Cramped, the giant windows means it’s hot and the sun is always in your eyes… Any reason they need to only use one rail? We already have road & rail buses, trucks, etc…just use those.

echodot,

They use one rail so they can pass each other on single line tracks. Which are quite common for rural lines.

If only there was some sort of article you could have read.

Kissaki,

At least this one certainly can’t pass each other on one track.

https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/6560fff1-200c-4055-b1b9-b2adcde10a78.webp

echodot,

They explained that one in the article as well.

This is a prototype so it has the mechanism so it doesn’t fall over if the prototype fails. The actual production version won’t have that. It’s also running at low speed for the same reason.

KingThrillgore,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

Well, I think they look cute.

MrFloppy, (edited )

I think “Draisy” is faster on the track and a much more realistic project. But “Monocab” is a University project, so it’s ok for me that a few millions are invested there.

Landsharkgun,

Yes, this looks much better. My other thought would be road-rail buses, but getting on/off the tracks might be too much work to be worth the extra flexibility.

echodot,

I’ve seen one of those in Japan. Even they admit that the only reason they continue to run it is for the novelty factor, it’s apparently quite expensive to keep going and not really that efficient.

It takes a good while to convert between the two modes since you have to be really careful you don’t misalign the thing and result in a derail. So it’s done, very, very, slowly.

kELAL,

Fahr’n, fahr’n, fahr’n mit ein Gadgetbahn 🎶

tesseract,

Exactly what we need! More pods! SMH!

Simulation6,

Looks like walking speed in their testing.

adespoton,

Anything faster would be a safety issue.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@beehaw.org
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines