My team and I have been working on this platform for a while now and we wanted to share it for those who might be interested.
The goal of GIGO Dev is to offer a learning platform that addresses all the challenges we encountered when we first learned to code.
The repo consists of all parts of the platform from the lib models to the frontend code. We wanted to open source our platform for people to be able to see how it works, provide feedback on what we can do differently, or even contribute!
We continue to work on it everyday and strive to always make it better.
Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.
I figured it would look more professional, and it would also let me separate the contributions I made with my more anonymous GitHub out—not too sure how closely they investigate your previous contributions and how good your code was.
I am guessing this was not a good choice, and I should have just continued using my more anonymous GitHub, or made the account as JSmith instead of JaneSmith.
FOSS Android app: Loop Habit Tracker (github.com)
Not the creator, just stumbled across this and thought FOSS on Beehaw might like it
GIGO Dev - An Open Source Learning Platform for Programmers (www.reddit.com)
Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men (www.researchgate.net)
Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.