lemmy.dbzer0.com

derbis, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

đŸ«€

Maybe some examples would be in order.

Counterexamples might include Firefox, Blender, and Lemmy.

glukoza,

firefox is not that clear, they get funding by google for putting google as default search engine thus helping google. We have a problem with FOSS funding

derbis,

While that’s true I think this meme is far from a fair characterization of that arrangement, given how Mozilla differs so starkly from Google on the direction of the open web. Case in point, their refusal to deprecate manifest v2 for browser extensions.

DroneRights,

Doesn’t this meme say big tech tries to control FOSS and can’t?

WeLoveCastingSpellz,

It is the only way they can get as much funding so I would say that it’s more than in the clear, firefox is the only escape from google’s monopoly on web (chrominum)

glukoza,

Maybe some examples would be in order.

I agree on that. I’m looking into writting about FOSS funding with examples and proposing solutions for this issue. Just that takes a long time and a meme is easier.

henfredemars, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

I’m stupid. What’s the squiggly black line in the third frame?

glukoza,

that is a whip

jarfil,

Right in the spokes!

ISometimesAdmin, to technology in truth of opensource and foss
@ISometimesAdmin@the.coolest.zone avatar

Hey, I maintain a highly popular (if niche) FOSS library. Where the fuck is my big tech paycheck where they bribe me into integrating with their product?

/s Silly take IMO, relies on cherry-picking popular FOSS projects where you can see "the influence" of big tech, AND then No True Scotsman your way into saying that they're not allowed to participate in the development/influence of FOSS because... checks notes they're the ones funding the project/putting money in front of otherwise unpaid volunteers?

If you end up coming up with a better scheme for things that has the actual practical effect of compensating devs appropriately (yes, that means at current market rates or better) for their work, then please let us know so we can switch to doing that immediately. I will literally do anything you suggest if it would achieve that end.

dannym,

what FOSS library do you maintain?

ISometimesAdmin,
@ISometimesAdmin@the.coolest.zone avatar
redcalcium, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

Company: You made this?

Open Source Dev: Yes

Company: 


Company: I made this.

Darken,
@Darken@reddthat.com avatar

he forgot to commit and push license.txt

CharStar,
@CharStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Well, not having any license means that you still retain full copyright for it. (In the US)

jivandabeast,

FR, I’ve had this happen to me before (albeit on a WAY smaller scale, though im not sure if it had to do with the absent license)

Atemu,
@Atemu@lemmy.ml avatar

Pushes Apache License

BoastfulDaedra, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

I have no idea what’s going on in this


sarmale, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

Does that mean that Big tech cant control it or that it does?

MJBrune,

To me, it reads as both. It tries to control it but regardless it flips upside down and no one moves in the same direction.

glukoza,

That it does

PoisonedPrisonPanda, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

Well you havent seen my corporation then


janabuggs, to technology in truth of opensource and foss

Lucy, essplain

Gradually_Adjusting, to 196 in do as you rule
@Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world avatar

The only avocation for which a fifteen year old is even marginally suited. Even so, not all succeed.

momocchi, to 196 in hypothetical quick time rule

I choose not to press x

Zoidsberg,
@Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca avatar

Is it morally wrong to choose inaction, to not involve ourselves in a no-win scenario? By simply being present, are we already involved? Will God someday judge us for these most pivotal moments?

I also choose not to press x.

RIP_Cheems, to 196 in hypothetical quick time rule
@RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world avatar

Don’t you dare press that button.

haidbz,

I feel like I’m missing some context here. Why wouldn’t I press that button?

RIP_Cheems,
@RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world avatar

Because it would be funny.

Artemis_Mystique, to 196 in hypothetical quick time rule

wikipe-tan provides excellent demonstrations for a variety of Wikipedia articles: Example

antonim,

Fan service

This article may be written from a fan’s point of view, rather than a neutral point of view.

hmm

SnotFlickerman, to 196 in Axolotyl rule
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Capitalists talking about nature, ecology, and planet earth.

FlapKap, to 196 in Axolotyl rule

Is this a tautology?

TimewornTraveler,

nah. “what currently exists must necessarily exist”. it adds the “must”, as in, “the world could not be otherwise.” that statement alone is not contained in “what currently exists” so adding the “must” thus develops the statement further rather than just redoubling it.

essellburns, to 196 in Axolotyl rule

The opposing force is the idea that whatever exists is the result of luck, bad judgement, random choices or ill intent, rather than inherent or inevitable consequence.

It’s not linear. History is one of those machines with the balls that fall down randomly and form a bell curve.

BautAufWasEuchAufbaut,
@BautAufWasEuchAufbaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

inherent or inevitable consequence

Can you give an example?

essellburns,

For example, the seeming contradiction between the values good people claim to pursue in life and the contradictions to those they’re willing to tollerate.

That’s not a product of the modern deceptions of a globalised economy as some have claimed, it’s a product of the way humans are not capable of including the whole world in sense of what’s real

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ‱
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines