Food preference is very individual, so understandably, not everyone is going to have the same tastes as him. But that’s a pretty poor reason to favour a different voice when it comes to objective claims on food science.
The article specifically did ask two other people, who gave more equivocal answers, saying that the flame is part of the answer but that most of it comes from just the high temperature.
Either way, on this particular question, you can visually see the flame ignite the aerosolized droplets. Note that it’s not unique to Chinese or wok cooking, as you can see a similar phenomenon with French chefs sauteing mushrooms in butter, where the flame can flare up at the edge of the pan. The taste comes specifically from that flame above the food, not below the pan.
I’m confused by this title. I take beans and rice and spices on every camping trip and they already come dehydrated from the store. This is just cooking with extra steps.
You’re buying and bringing pre-cooked beans that have been dehydrated or just dry beans? Instant rice (which has been cooked and dehydrated) or just regular rice you have to cook for a long time? Dry beans have to be soaked for hours and then cooked for like half an hour unless you have a pressure cooker right?
If you cook everything and dehydrate it you can just add hot water and the food soaks up the hot water and you can eat it, like making instant ramen noodles except whatever meal you want. You can do this with purchased instant rice and instant beans, and then dehydrate the chicken and tomatoes and onions and everything else separate, I just find it’s cheaper for ingredients to buy regular rice and beans and cook everything together and dehydrate it together, plus then the flavors get cooked into the beans and rice much better.
Admittedly, beans and rice is more of a starter entry meal into dehydrating because it’s hard to mess it up. But more complex meals like a dehydrated chili or dehydrated chicken curry, you can’t just “take on every camping trip” especially if you are sleeping far from your vehicle.
But more complex meals like a dehydrated chili or dehydrated chicken curry, you can’t just “take on every camping trip” especially if you are sleeping far from your vehicle.
How are you camping? Chili and beans and such are normal things to cook while camping without them being made and dehydrated before arriving on site because they keep well and are fairly lightweight. 🤨
I go camping all the time and the only thing I bring that I would dehydrate first is maybe some meat to have jerky because meat is the only thing I bring that doesn’t keep without refrigeration.
I do think it’s a good idea for meals you would not or could not make on a fire/camping stove or wouldn’t keep without refrigeration, though. And definitely sounds good on a road trip where you don’t have a fire or camp stove to actually cook.
Do you bring a cooler? I don’t understand what you mean by chili keeping well? You cannot put chili in a ziplock bag, put it in your backpack, and eat it four days later, it will go bad. You also cannot bring a cooler on a through hike. Anything besides car glamping you’re going to have to dehydrate chili if you want to bring it, or pay exorbitant prices for a brand pre-made like mountain house or peak refuel.
How am I camping? Last trip was a 5 day through the BWCA, before that was a 7 day backpacking through the tetons, prior to that it was a 5 day canyoneering in southeast Utah (don’t even get me started on trying to keep a cooler cold in utah even when we did have a night near the car). Dehydrated foods are shelf stable! That’s the draw. Super lightweight and shelf stable. Just add hot water!
I’m saying you make the chili at your camp site, since everything except the meat doesn’t need to be kept cold. I don’t bring a cooler either so meat is either dehydrated or eaten only on the first day of a multiple day trip. I’m not usually on long hikes, though; the tomatoes might get squished in that instance. Though, you could also have them canned (store bought or canned yourself) 🤷🏻♂️
Ah sure I see what you’re saying. And you can definitely bring all the ingredients separate (you bring cans of tomatoes and tomato paste and wet foods? Bringing whole tomaotes in your backpack is something I’ve never heard of, thats heavy, wet messy, and also more inportantly not shelf stable. And canned shelf stable tomatoes are soo heavy and lots of trash to carry out) and cook everything and add dehydrated meat into it, but that’s a ton more work out in nature and burns way more fuel than just prepping at home and then heating up water for almost instant chili on trail. When I’m in nature I want to spend my time enjoying nature not lugging around cans and a can opener, spending an hour plus prepping and cooking a meal. Dehydrated meals take about 15min to rehydrate and you get the quality food that you had a whole real kitchen to prepare.
@SubArcticTundra Because the flavor goes into the water! That's why soup broth tastes good. Try chopping up half an onion, boiling for 10 minutes in a pot with enough water to cover them, then taste the water.
I’m definitely a little late to the party here, but I just wanted to say that I love coffee but almost exclusively drink decaf and the lack of flavors is the bane of my existence.
I think because decaf coffee drinkers are the minority, coffee roasters don’t want to invest a lot in decaf varietals; but if you think about it, decaf should have the most roast/flavor varietals since if you’re drinking decaf, you’re only drinking it for the flavor (you certainly aren’t drinking it for the caffeine).
Duck breast, seasoned and cooked skin side down on med low heat until crispy, basting with rhe fat. Risotto with saffron, parmesan & black pepper Roast asparagus with truffle oil.
crusty bread with aïoli
a good table wine, doesn’t have to be expensive but good
dark chocolate ganache over orange, dried cranberries, hazelnuts (“turtles”)
Cooking is an inherently manual task, and as such any meaningful improvements to cooking tools are enhancements to the manual capabilities of the tools. These are improvements to things like speed/precision/durability of mixing, heating, weighing, etc. Often times the most meaningful improvements are improvements in mechanisms in cooking machines or the materials they are made of, but there are definitely examples of electronics or software contributing in this way. Good examples would be fuzzy logic applied to electric kettles to make the act of heating to a specific temperature more precise by controlling the heating element so the water is brought to temperature without overshoot, or PID controllers in espresso machines controlling pumps to follow a specific pressure curve instead of requiring complex mechanical systems to accomplish the same thing. The problem with many of these internet-connected or heavily software-dependent appliances is that their added features do not improve the manual capabilities of the appliance in any way, sure the machine will tell you how much weight of flour you need for your cake, but your cake won’t be better than one produced by a “dumb” machine because the scale isn’t any more precise than any other scale that would be used for that purpose.
The other issue with these devices is a fallacy that’s really common in kitchen equipment, which is the idea that more functions = better. Fundamentally, a device designed to do both task A and task B will be worse than an equivalently priced combination of one device for task A and one device for task B, because there is a cost associated with engineering the device to accomplish both tasks. This effect is especially noticable on all-in-one devices that mix, weigh, and heat because there’s a lot more complexity, and thus a lot more cost spent on integrating the components together
Probably because I rambled for way too long and didn’t give sources lol, here’s a couple examples from America’s test kitchen demonstrating what I mean:
Review of a combo Dutch oven/slow cooker that’s not great at either job, and is more expensive than buying the two items separately youtu.be/llPyDvfHx3k
Gear roundup for 2023, the best things were ones that innovated in materials or tech that was actually useful, worst things were overcomplicated equipment that didn’t actually try to use tech to improve the mechanics of the cooking equipment youtu.be/AU3mUjIF3A8
Tofu is like a third of the sirloin stake? Did not expect that “eating less plastics” would be among the benefits of me not eating meat. Strange times.
I have been, up until very recently, a “Thanksgiving Traditionalist”, in that I loudly proclaimed that one should muck around with the traditional basics.
But last year, I changed my tune. We had a dinner based around Stanley Tucci’s timpano instead of turkey (yes, the famous timpano from the movie BIG NIGHT). That was a big success.
This year, because I have some very dear friends who are vegetarians and who kind of slink away when anyone discusses Thanksgiving traditional dishes, I wanted to make dinner with their needs/desires squarely in mind, so I am doing a completely vegetarian menu. I generally despise “meat analogues”, so no, we’re not having tofurkey. So, here’s the menu:
velouté de châitagnes (chestnut soup)
Spanish tortilla (the potato dish, not the Mexican flatbread)
my grandmother’s green bean casserole (very unique, not-what-you-expect, nod to tradition)
food
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.