Entropy, I’ve never been so offended in my life. This is fucking blasphemy.
SomeBoyo, Watch me put pineapple on that, to prove you wrong.
Smoogs, Hmm… I may have to try this…
Entropy, You monster ಠ︵ಠ
frezik, Haven’t the Japanese people suffered enough?
corymbia, Jeans?
x4740N, This man needs to be put in a Japanese jail and force fed proper sushi until they learn what sushi is
pfjarschel, ithadtobebrazil
PeriodicallyPedantic, They’re gonna send a nuke back, for this one
altima_neo, General Reposti
ObviouslyNotBanana, That’s my name, don’t wear it out
Grass, They shouldn’t have killed Harambe
EdibleFriend, I will punch your dad in the cock
ObviouslyNotBanana, Thanks, I’ve not gotten the chance to do that myself yet.
EdibleFriend, Np bb <3
De_Narm, To be fair, ketchup is mostly sugar and vinegar. Sushi already has vinegar in it and the sauce already on there is presumably something like teriyaki - which is also based on sugar.
No_Eponym, No. Do not “both sides” this monster.
blanketswithsmallpox, I will, and I’ll throw Spam on it too! And it’ll still be fucking delicious!
Why? Because rice plus meat plus sauce is hard to fuck up lol.
Iris, Spam musubi can attest to that
jelloeater85, Sometimes you go full on stupid food. And once in a while, it fuckin works ❤️
leaveWitX, I’d rather eat that fish without any seasoning or sauce
answersplease77, I actually eat sushi with ketchup. it’s delicious
Crackhappy, I like it with mushroom catsup, but I’m not a big fan of tomato ketchup.
DragonTypeWyvern, What the hell is mushroom catsup?
SailorMoss, (edited )
Hupf, Is that what we’re gonna do - we’re going to have a fight?
FluffyPotato, I really don’t like sushi but good salmon or trout is frigging expensive and tasty
niktemadur, And what that on the breaded fried roll?
BBQ sauce!
Igloojoe, Probably hoisin sauce
niktemadur, Something umami, of course. I was just saying in the spirit of ketchup on salmon.
kn33, Alright, that’s it. This person needs war crimes done to them.
DragonTypeWyvern, If they break the Geneva Conventions first it’s technically no longer a war crime
Chaser, I don’t think that’s accurate
DragonTypeWyvern, It is. The Geneva Conventions acknowledge that if your enemy is breaking them you are allowed to respond in kind.
It’s what allowed America to argue it can torture prisoners, because they either belong to non-signatories or broke them as well/first. The Conventions offer protection to civilian populations of even non-signatories but there are ways around it.
For example, America would declare any male over 12 in the area a terrorist which is obviously not a problem and is definitely very cool.
It gets fairly complicated in the weeds, as demonstrated, but this example is a clear violation and they have no grounds for complaint.
Add comment