forbes.com

SkybreakerEngineer, to games in Activision’s Bobby Kotick Thinks We’ll Be Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink To Play Video Games

Do you guys not have brain implants?

Sanctus, to games in Activision’s Bobby Kotick Thinks We’ll Be Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink To Play Video Games
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

People are perfectly happy booting up machines and using external HIM devices to interact with them. If VR didn’t explode to the new norm, why the fuck would brain chips?

insomniac_lemon,
@insomniac_lemon@kbin.social avatar

I'm somebody who hasn't tried VR due to like 4 different problems that relate to money (VR itself, GPU, floor space, games) plus I'm pretty sure I'd have motion sickness as well due to health issues. Out-of-body VR is an escapist fantasy of mine but I'd still steer clear of anything involving techbros.

I'd sooner make a deal to give my brain to some rando who somehow has a cryonic freezer in their basement.

squirrel, to games in Activision’s Bobby Kotick Thinks We’ll Be Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink To Play Video Games
@squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

If there is one upside to the Microsoft/ActiBlizz merger, then it is that this parasite will finally get out of the gaming industry. Kotick has shown again and again that he barely knows what his studios actually did. He infamously stalled the development of games with his incompetence, burdening devs with needless extra work.

So that guy now thinks he knows what the future of gaming is going to look like? Get f***ed, Kotick!

AllNewTypeFace, to games in Activision’s Bobby Kotick Thinks We’ll Be Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink To Play Video Games
@AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space avatar

What could possibly go wrong?

simonced,

I hope something goes wrong…

AllNewTypeFace, to games in Activision’s Bobby Kotick Thinks We’ll Be Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink To Play Video Games
@AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space avatar

What could possibly go wrong?

Never_Sm1le, to games in The ‘Dota 2’ International 12 Prize Pool Is Historically Low
@Never_Sm1le@lemdro.id avatar

Valve had already announce beforehand that they won’t focus on the TI battlepass this year so this is something expected

Kraivo,

Yeah, because this year they don’t want to sell cosmetics or don’t want to make cosmetics to sell it.

ngcbassman,

I think the plan is to release all the cosmetic stuff after TI, so they don’t have to share the money with the pros. Probably they already know that in that way they just get more money

terrrmus, to gaming in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well
@terrrmus@kbin.social avatar

This and Square still charging forward with crypto/NFT bullshit is wild.

Eggyhead, to gaming in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well
@Eggyhead@kbin.social avatar

Even the best live-service games end up a confusing, convoluted mess of menus and currencies that are hard to navigate. And that's before you even try actually play it.

teamevil, to games in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well

I hate that my Xbox keeps trying to sell me on battle pass for COD. I’m not buying any more versions of the game.

blazera, to gaming in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well

Things dont go well when you dont let creators decide what to create.

TragicJonson, to gaming in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well

It definitely feels like this is counter to their competitive advantage in the market (marque single player titles), but maybe the numbers on that just aren't big enough anymore.

newthrowaway20, to games in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well

It is baffling why Sony thinks studios who are known for their single player story driven games will all the sudden be rock stars at GAAS model games. No matter how it turns out, you’ve already got a dedicated fan base for these companies expecting a single player story driven game. These types of gamers have no interest whatsoever in micro transaction riddled online experiences. And by diverting developers away from single player content towards GAAS content, they’ll make worse single player games and half hearted multiplayer online games.

conciselyverbose, to gaming in Insiders Say PlayStation’s Live Service Pivot May Not Be Going Well

I did really like the original last of us multiplayer game mode.

I have no interest if the plan is continuous monetization, but it was a solid set of modes with enjoyable combat.

shiveyarbles, to gaming in ‘Diablo 4’ Has Hotfixed In Huge Changes For Make Leveling To 100 Less Of A Slog

Is this the patch that adds the fun?

admin,
@admin@beehaw.org avatar

Not quite.

marco, to gaming in ‘Diablo 4’ Has Hotfixed In Huge Changes For Make Leveling To 100 Less Of A Slog
@marco@beehaw.org avatar

That’s not really getting me to try again either :p

World Tier 3 monster kill XP has been buffed by 5%

World Tier 4 monsters kill XP has been buffed by 15%

Also keep in mind this joins a bunch of other XP-boosting patches in the past. Last week, Blizzard also buffed the XP gain urn in Season of the Malignant to go from an 8% XP buff to a 20% XP buff, making seasonal play by far the fastest way to get your characters to the highest levels in the game.

admin,
@admin@beehaw.org avatar

I’ll play the seasons up until the game gets boring and then stop. I believe that, over the next couple of years, that they will make the ENTIRE game fun to play. Until then, I’ll play until I’m bored and quit.

marco,
@marco@beehaw.org avatar

I’m definitely not in the camp that D4 sucks completely, but so far I never kept playing after reaching Tier 2. Thanks to the betas I have done that a few times… I’ve played Diablo 1, 2, & 3 for so many hours, but yes, I haven’t lost hope that D4 will eventually also turn into something that I want to played longer. “Stay a while and listen” ;)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines