737

@737@lemmy.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

737,

maybe try


<span style="color:#323232;">lspci </span><span style="font-weight:bold;color:#a71d5d;">> </span><span style="color:#323232;">~/Documents/lspci.txt
</span>
737,

rise and shine, mister freeman, rise and … shine

737,

It’s by the fsfe, so mainly targeting the EU.

737,

also

We need software that fosters the sharing of good ideas and solutions. Like this we will be able to improve IT services for people all over Europe.

737,

I believe that’s what they call fractional updates.

The anti-AI sentiment in the free software communities is concerning. (lemmy.world)

Whenever AI is mentioned lots of people in the Linux space immediately react negatively. Creators like TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube always feel the need to add a disclaimer that “some people think AI is problematic” or something along those lines if an AI topic is discussed. I get that AI has many problems but at the same...

737,

I’ve yet to see a need for “AI integration ✨” in to the desktop experience. Copilot, LLM chat bots, TTS, OCR, and translation using machine learning are all interesting but I don’t think OS integration is beneficial.

737,

not every high tech product or idea makes it, you don’t see a lot of netbooks or wifi connected kitchen appliances these days either; having the ability to make tiny devices or connecting every single device is not justification enough to actually do it. i view ai integration similarly: having an llm in some side bar to change the screen brightness, find some time or switch the keyboard layout isn’t really useful. being able to select text in an image viewer or searching through audio and video for spoken words for example would be a useful application for machine learning in the DE, that isn’t really what’s advertised as “AI” though.

737,

i don’t really think anyone would be against the last two examples to be integrated in dolphin, nautilus, gwenview… either.

737,

maybe, but these people wouldn’t own a pc with a dedicated gpu or neutral network accelerator.

737,

I might give their human testing program a try.

737,

i think it’s related to the pridemonth meme

737,

I’m too terminally online for that

rule month (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

image: a drawn picture of a cute smiling demon, with red skin, horns, a pointy tail and a rainbow tattoo, wearing hot pants and a t-shirt with a transition from the text “pridemonth” to highlight the “demon” part of the word. there is a cute frog with a rainbow flag in the demons right pants pocket. the backgroung is...

737,

please mark nsfw, i wouldn’t want to have this show up in public

737,

it’s a mediocre media player, i don’t really use it anymore. blender, Linux, ffmpeg, gcc, llvm, V8, cpython are all far more important just to name a few

737,

apple and cinnamon pastry triangle with a slice of spam

737,

some c# game engine collision stuff with drag

737,

he even had them unsausage his fingers

737,

it’s the back of a modern London bus. there is nothing wrong with it

737,

taxes

737,

Or maybe because his PR team really outdid themselves with the shitty car schtick.

737,

Not liking Arch is exclusively a skill issue. You may prefer stable release distros, but you won’t find a rolling release distro better than Arch.

737,

Tumbleweed is way worse, zypper is very bad, it’s backed by a corporation, no AUR, it’s honestly quite mediocre.

737,

It’s not bad, just not exceptional (like Arch).

737,

Arch is just as easy to install with a smaller ISO and a faster installer. Advertising EndeavourOS to inexperienced users will also lead to issues due to incompatibilities with the wiki due to dracut, the systemd firewall, and potentially systemd-boot.

737,

Arch has an installer

737,

People who are are not able to use or dislike a TUI install script should not be using Arch or an Arch based distro. Especially when taking into account that EndeavourOS doesn’t have a GUI package manager.

At least Manjaro has a point with it’s slower repos and pamac.

EndeavorOS is just Arch with Calamares, some welcome window bloat, and pacman hooks to have it be distinguished from Arch by neofetch; all at the cost of the install duration: the download is slower, the flashing is slower, the boot is slower, the installer is slower, even pacman is slower due to the hooks.

You can just download in ISO of Arch with Calamares instead, if you really want it (example)

EndeavorOS does not contribute anything to make the install process easier nor to the experience using it. Why it is still so popular after the reintroduction of archinstall really remains a mystery to me. I really only view it as a security risk due to the smaller team.

737,

I’m pretty sure you only get the full resolution image when clicking on it, not right away when loading the page. That would at least explain why you can download images in multiple resolutions from Wikipedia.

737,

Arch, OpenSUSE TW, and Debian Sid are pretty good. As a desktop/WM I’d recommend Hyprland, Plasma, or DWL. Hyprland and DWL take some time to set up and get used to though. GNOME is sort of a pain in the ass, so I wouldn’t recommend it unless you use touch gestures a lot.

737,

the guy who invented straight people

737,

I really dislike these Arch forks that don’t add anything really special. The more your system differs from a normal Arch install, (dracut on EndeavourOS for example) the less helpful resources will be available. Just use Arch instead.

737,

mainly not being based on chromium, no integrated crypto stuff, css theming support, and some compatibility issues with complex websites (as a result of no chromium)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines