ilinamorato

@ilinamorato@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ilinamorato,

This sort of passive-aggressive “help” feels like a relic of the early 2010s we could do without.

ilinamorato,

How do you think the OP is supposed to know that “SDDM” is the issue to look up? You don’t get to enforce another person’s effort. If all you want to provide is "you’re looking for ‘SDDM,’ that would provide help and empower them without sounding like you’re biting the newbie for not knowing everything.

ilinamorato,

I don’t know about other people, but it’s way easier to google something than to ask a question and then wait for the answer. I’m not OP, but if I’ve asked a question, it’s only because I’ve exhausted my ability to find the answer on its own.

ilinamorato,

Well, there was zero effort documented in the post.

You’re not their teacher. It’s not your job to decide how much effort they’ve put forth, or to grade whether or not that is sufficient.

Take a look at Ubuntu trying to teach newcomers how to ask a question.

And if they documented their research process, you’d say “tldr just ask the question.” Stop trying to be paternalistic and gatekeepy. Just answer or don’t.

ilinamorato,

Yes. I would assume that the problem is in X11 or Wayland before thinking it could be SDDM, frankly. But even then, googling “Linux login screen” doesn’t immediately reveal SDDM to be the point of concern.

ilinamorato,

That’s totally the biggest problem with the internet. And definitely deploying self-important moderaptors is the way to fix it.

/s, of course. Get off your high horse.

ilinamorato, (edited )

Ah, you made an edit. Yeah, “kde login rotation” does, but “EndeavourOS login rotation” gives you no results mentioning SDDM. Giving people the benefit of the doubt costs you nothing over assuming that they’re lazy, and the added bonus is that you don’t sound like a jerk.

ilinamorato,

I’m not moving any goalposts at all. I’m expressing how inexperience and bad assumptions can make one’s searching unfruitful through no fault of their own. That’s all I’ve ever been saying.

ilinamorato,

When will Jim Jones’ supporters wake up? Cults do extensive mental rewiring to people’s brains. Their minds literally cannot conceive of their leader doing anything evil anymore.

No, the question isn’t when his supporters will wake up, it’s when will the people who still think he’s “bad, but the lesser of two evils” wake up?

ilinamorato,

Whew. Good point. And sobering.

ilinamorato,

And binds but does not protect anyone else.

ilinamorato,

Also, technically the Flag Code isn’t the law. Not that that occurred to them when people were using it for progressive protests.

ilinamorato,

They never think their gonzo opinions through to their logical conclusions.

ilinamorato,

The past 40 years of complete inaction on the part of businesses determined that was a lie.

ilinamorato,

I get deported back to my own country constantly. Every day, against my will, I find myself here.

ilinamorato,

Why are we less concerned about provoking Putin than we are about provoking Netanyahu?

ilinamorato,

Thank you for providing some nuance. Ugh, this situation is so complicated. I do wonder, however, how much it’s worth that we have such strong values surrounding the way we support our allies if we are willing to countenance the evil things they do and still call them allies.

ilinamorato,

That’s not what I was saying at all. I was legitimately asking the question. I hadn’t considered the foreign policy implications of Israel being an ally.

ilinamorato,

Bankruptcy is intended to be (though is not often in actuality) a temporary restructuring period. A lot of companies just end up liquidating while under bankruptcy proceedings, but Atari emerged from Chapter 11 in 2014 after a year of restructuring and selling off IPs to pay their bills. Now they’re doing a bunch of stuff, including casinos and hotels.

ilinamorato,

Obviously this is a terrible idea, but I’m gonna answer it seriously for the sake of dunking on it.

  1. The amount of work. I mean, just astronomical. That’s 1,650 miles of longitude this dude is talking about filling in; the largest earth-moving project ever was the Panama Canal, and it’s only about 50 miles long. Plus, by comparison, it’s essentially a one-dimensional line! This looks like it’s probably in the ballpark of 500-ish miles from the current shore to the new shore, and two-ish miles from the surface to the floor.
  2. Where would we get the land from? It’s not like there’s a pile just sitting around. I guess we could dredge the Pacific and truck it across to pour into the Atlantic? Take down the Appalachians and the Rockies? Bring down an asteroid into the ocean? None of that would be enough. In fact, nothing I can think of that we have access to could even come close to providing enough dirt (remember, we need 1,650 x 500 x 2 cubic miles of it!), even if we could manage to do it without destroying ecosystems or killing billions of people.
  3. The people who have spent a lot of money buying homes and businesses on the current Eastern seaboard of the United States would probably have something to say about this plan. (Something loud and something very angry.) Besides, it would completely upend the shipping industry, the fishing industry, the tourism industry, and more. This would legitimately destroy multiple national economies, and that’s before you even take into account the ecological disaster.
  4. Sea level rise is already a major problem. So displacing a bunch of water in favor of dirt probably isn’t going to help that too terribly much.
  5. why? A lot of America is sitting unused or underused. If you were to clump all of the US’s land use into discrete blocks, it would look like this: ImageThe area labeled “LAND?” on the ocean in the OP map is, give or take, the size of the current amount of land owned by the 100 largest landowning families, private family timberland, golf, and fallow land (meaning land used for nothing). This means that the area that the person in question is asking about is already essentially or literally being used for nothing at all. Before we start undertaking an ecologically-disastrous and fundamentally impossible project, we’d probably figure out ways to use that other land.

But there’s more. The land that is being used is almost entirely being underused. For instance, take the “Cow pasture/range” section of the map; cattle account, by far, for the highest land use of any land use in the country. But the 28.2 million cows in America only need about an acre of land each; meaning that the 124.7 million acres of land they roam is about five times bigger than what they actually need. Most of the other production uses for land in the US (along with rural housing) are similarly sprawling because they can be; land is comparatively cheap, so there’s no real reason to consolidate. If that changes, land prices will rise, and the people and companies holding on to underused land will discover that it makes financial sense to sell and reconfigure their businesses to make more efficient use of the land.

So calm down, Lex Luthor. The problem isn’t that resources are actually scarce. It’s that people at the top have a financial interest in underusing their holdings so that they can keep prices artificially high.

ilinamorato,

I went a more math-less way when I read this originally. The moon is about a quarter the width (diameter) of the Earth, and the variances in the height of the Earth’s crust (mountains and trenches) aren’t visible in satellite images of Earth. If you cut the moon in half and put it down in the Atlantic, would it change the contour of the Earth’s crust as seen from orbit? Yeah, it’d be another eighth-again as wide on one side. You’d notice.

Doing some quick checking confirms: the Atlantic has a volume of about 355 million cubic kilometers. The moon is about 22 billion cubic kilometers. So you’d only need about 1.6% of the moon to fill up the Atlantic.

This is fun. It feels like an xkcd What-If.

ilinamorato,

American gumption sneers at the laws of physics!

ilinamorato,

My understanding is that they need an acre each specifically to prevent overgrazing, but I could be mistaken there.

ilinamorato,

I’m aware of that land use need, but actually most farmers use crop rotation to fulfill that need. You plant a crop that depletes phosphorus one year, and then one that restores it the next year. Obviously that’s oversimplified, but actually letting land lie fallow isn’t as critical anymore in a more diverse agricultural world.

Besides, letting land lie fallow is agricultural use, as you’re restoring the land for later growing seasons. That, iirc, is why the word “idle” is included on the map alongside “fallow;” true fallowing would be included in the agriculture regions.

ilinamorato,

Too much effort for these stupid “ideas”. Of it were a child, explain it like you did, but I presume it isn’t. So let me explain it: No.

How profoundly arrogant to presume to tell me what to do or not to do with my own time. I’ll use my time how I like, thank you very much.

And it wasn’t wasted time. I learned things, I produced something, I had fun doing it. I may have even educated others.

Get off your high horse. What you did in posting a complaint about the effort I expended was way more useless than what I did.

ilinamorato,

Glad you enjoyed it!

ilinamorato,

There’s definitely not a /fill command.

ilinamorato,

Fertilizer does provide some help, but cover crops and crop rotation is still necessary. Anhydrous ammonia and ammonium nitrate don’t replenish everything that crops take out of the ground (really just nitrogen); and even if it did, it’s really expensive.

ilinamorato,

Well, I think the word “barren” is a little bit more ambiguous, but generally “fallow” implies that it could be used, but isn’t; while “barren” means that it couldn’t be used for any productive purpose (specifically any agricultural purpose). In other words, land could be temporarily fallow but used again later, but would likely require remediation or even engineering to make productive if it’s barren.

ilinamorato,

Ugh. I hate it when geriatric populist fascists accidentally stumble into a halfway decent joke.

“I notice it keeps tilting to the left,” Trump joked, “Like too many other things!”

I guess he is an “entertainer,” so it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that his jokes are better than his platform. Double entendre definitely intended.

Of course, to everyone watching—at least, to everyone watching who isn’t behind Trump—it’s pretty clear that everything is actually tilting to the right, and becoming a whole lot more unstable.

ilinamorato,

“If there’s no massive cheating” is such a meaningless phrase that they could use it to mean anything afterward. “Oh no, I heard someone say that their cousin was a cashier at a store where their coworker overheard a customer talking on the phone about a letter that their post office received from Russia on election day, so obviously there’s massive cheating and Trump should just be in office.”

That said, I don’t know that this rises to the level of “outrageous” in modern political discourse, sadly. A “foolish” position, definitely. “Corrupt,” perhaps. “Morally bankrupt.” “Anti-democratic.” But the position is much more reasonable than most Republicans are willing to grant these days, and that’s what’s truly outrageous.

ilinamorato,

“(A) Tennessee woman (who was) denied (an) abortion after (finding out her) fetus’ ‘brain (was) not attached’ slams (Tennessee’s abortion) ban”

Hope that helps.

ilinamorato,

It’s valid English and grammar, but it’s a potentially reasonable position that anything which requires a specific domain knowledge to interpret may be valid but isn’t perfect. You kind of have to know how journalists shorten sentences to make headlines in order to read it correctly; most native English-speaking adults do have that domain knowledge, but clearly not everyone since OP didn’t have it.

That said, I don’t know why this specific headline tripped OP up. It doesn’t seem particularly ambiguous or difficult to me.

ilinamorato,

Johnson is “we’re electing a president not a pastor” incarnate, with all the short-sightedness and tomfoolery that comes with it.

ilinamorato,

Did his son get an email about it?

ilinamorato,

But the point of Bethesda isn’t to sell their games. It’s to sell GamePass. Nobody has to play Fallout, they just have to want to play Fallout enough to buy GamePass.

ilinamorato,

They saw what MKBHD’s honest reviews did to Fisker and Humane and said “can we stop that from happening?”

ilinamorato,

Republican kills dog, is asked questions about it: “This interview is ridiculous”

Republican commits many crimes, is charged & prosecuted about it: “This trial is ridiculous”

Republican agrees to terms allowing himself to be recalled if five people agree: “This congress’ inability to accomplish anything is ridiculous”

Republican kills a border bill that gives them everything they have been asking for for twenty years: “The situation at the border is ridiculous”

Republican passes huge tax cuts but increases DOD appropriations: “The budget deficit is ridiculous”

Every single problem, the GOP makes worse. But sure, the problem is pointing that out.

ilinamorato,

Presidential Immunity is Democracy

Prohibition is freedom

History is woke

ilinamorato,

“When Wolf 359 is in ashes, then you have my permission to die.”

ilinamorato,

The really funny thing to me about this is that this is canonical Star Trek because of Nemesis.

(Picard = Shinzon (genetically) = Tom Hardy = Bane)

ilinamorato,

No, it never made sense because it never accomplished its stated purpose. It only ever suppressed the will of the majority.

ilinamorato,

But less bad than Fentanyl and other C-IIs, it sounds like.

ilinamorato,

They aren’t only just now realizing that she’s an idiot; even they have known that for a while. She’s just not useful to them anymore, so they have no need to keep her around.

ilinamorato,

I don’t tend to mind the “hush money” framing, since that makes him sound like the mobster that he definitely is.

What're some of the dumbest things you've done to yourself in Linux?

I’m working on a some materials for a class wherein I’ll be teaching some young, wide-eyed Windows nerds about Linux and we’re including a section we’re calling “foot guns”. Basically it’s ways you might shoot yourself in the foot while meddling with your newfound Linux powers....

ilinamorato,

I’ve regularly found a solution to my problem on SO, only to discover that I need to figure out how to break my system exactly the same way the asker did before the fix will work.

ilinamorato,

I was setting up fail2ban on an sftp server at work.

Guess who got admin permanently banned from that machine.

ilinamorato,

Yeah, and maybe a frequent shoppers card from Epstein’s island.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fightinggames
  • All magazines