I worked at a similar company. If it’s what I’m familiar with, it’s mostly meant for young account owners to notify their elderly parents that there’s an emergency or stop buying stuff. (A lot of people refuse to put parental controls on their parents; DO IT)
The only thing is, they’re either using their ex’es service, or their ex has access to the account. If the latter is true, they need to remove their ex as a validated user, IMMEDIATELY.
Also, yes. Creepy ex’es call in all the time for thrir old partner’s personal details. That’s why THEY tell us to never GIVE OUT details to confirm identity. We ask for the details from the customer.
it’s like all sex is make up sex, but they also hate themselves and want you to agree with them. just because they are begging you to piss in their mouth doesn’t mean its awesome though.
Sex isn’t good unless you go to sleep after worrying about whether you’re about to get woken up by being hit with a skillet. If you’re lucky it’s not cast iron.
Oh it can stop being good. Trauma can do shit to you. Crazy in the head and crazy in bed sometimes blend into shit like sexual violence. And suddenly what you find yourself really craving is someone who is stable yet adventurous, someone who will discuss what crazy shit we’ll do together then discuss what we liked and didn’t afterwards.
She is dedicated, resourceful, and persistent. We don’t know if she showed up at his place at 3am just to watch him sleep, so jury is out on the crazy.
I’ll take you back if you can get a minimum wage that is a living wage with yearly increases tied to inflation while also maintaining a sub 4% inflation year over year until the Sun swallows the Earth. If you can’t do that, you don’t deserve me because you will never make me happy.
yep! that’s how the trap works. a red flag is a red flag no matter how many other green flags there are. this one is clearly a boundary bulldozer. imagine everything the OP in the screenshot had to go thru to block Jessica. yet, she’s still finding a way to contact them. im having flashbacks from this. 😵💫
This is a myth. The Win32 API doesn’t even have a method that returns the string “Windows 95”! Windows version numbers are numbers, not strings. Windows 95 was actually 4.0. Windows 98 was 4.1, ME was 4.5, and XP was 5.0.
Actually it’s not entirely a myth - there was some Java library that did this - but it wasn’t widespread at all, and certainly not the documented approach to check the version.
Close but not exactly. Windows 5 was 2000, Windows 5.1 was Windows XP.
But it’s more confusing than that because of the two different lines: the MS-DOS based line which covered Windows 1.0 through ME, and the multi-user NT line for workstations and servers which adopted the same version numbers as the currently released MS-DOS line that was available at the same time. I.E. windows NT 3.1 used the windows 3.1 UI from the DOS line, but was New-Technology instead of DOS under the hood. NT4 used the DOS based win95 UI, and NT5 was Windows 2000 also with the familiar Windows 9x UI. Everything since XP has been exclusively NT under the hood.
Lmao they only considered 95 > 98 > ME to be minor version updates? They didn’t even deserve their own major version? Although it’s probably pretty accurate, I remember 98 basically just being a slightly updated 95. I never used ME so no idea with that. It’s still pretty funny though.
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Newest